memex

Nascent attempt at using Foam to curate and leverage a personal memex

---

Project maintained by djplaner Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by mattgraham

To read

Collection of articles, web pages etc that I need to read.

• Computation notebook HCI/PL presentation Includes a research methodology for exploring what the challenges are for computational notebooks. Might be interesting/inspirational for educational technology research
• Enacting accountability in IS research after the sociomaterial turn(ing)
• COTS integration: plug and pray?
• An ecological approach to educational technology: affordance as a design tool for aligning pedagogy and technology
• Why do people use Information Technology
• Software engineering in the small
• Where the users are IT experts too
• Art of Engineering, One more time
• Computers in context: The philosohy and practice of systems design
• Paradox of the active user
• One size does not fit all

• Why users cannot get what they want

• A CAS agenda for ecosystem research methodology

How to help improve teaching and learning

• Martínez, C., & Olsson, T. (2021). Domestication outside of the domestic: Shaping technology and child in an educational moral economy. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948011
• Ovetz, R. (2020). The Algorithmic University: On-Line Education, Learning Management Systems, and the Struggle over Academic Labor. Critical Sociology, 0896920520948931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520948931Ovetz—2020—The Algorithmic University On-Line Education, Lea.pdf. (n.d.).Selwyn et al. - 2021—A necessary evil The rise of online exam proctori.pdf. (n.d.).
• Selwyn, N., O’Neill, C., Smith, G., Andrejevic, M., & Gu, X. (2021). A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia, 1329878X211005862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211005862
• Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Creating Epistemic Environments: Learning, Teaching and Design. In L. Markauskaite & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge (pp. 595–614). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4_20
• Brooker, P. (2019). My unexpectedly militant bots: A case for Programming-as-Social-Science. The Sociological Review, 67(6), 1228–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119840988`
• Designing for Deep and Meaningful Student-to-Content Interactions. (2007). TechTrends, 51(4), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0052-6
• Manzini E (2015) Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation
• Designing for Deep and Meaningful Student-to-Content Interactions. (2007). TechTrends, 51(4), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0052-6
• Yeung, K. L., Carpenter, S. K., & Corral, D. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Educational Technology on Objective Learning Outcomes in Academic Contexts. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09592-4
• Dimitriadis, Y., Martínez-Maldonado, R., & Wiley, K. (2021). Human-Centered Design Principles for Actionable Learning Analytics. In T. Tsiatsos, S. Demetriadis, A. Mikropoulos, & V. Dagdilelis (Eds.), Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 277–296). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_15
• Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Performativity of Materials in Learning: The Learning-Whole in Action. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.627
• Yeoman, P., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Moving between material and conceptual structure: Developing a card-based method to support design for learning. Design Studies, 64, 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.05.003
• Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7
• Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2019). Connecting the dots: Theorizing and mapping learning entanglement through archaeology and design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1104–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12761
• Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09811-3
• Wasson, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Learning Design: European Approaches. TechTrends, 64(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00498-0
• Zimmerman, W., Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). Evaluating Online Course Quality: A Study on Implementation of Course Quality Standards. Online Learning, 24(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2325
• Joshi, M., & Alavaikko, M. (2020). Service design approaches and applications in higher education: A thematic literature review. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00025_1
• Kimmons, R. (2020). Current Trends (and Missing Links) in Educational Technology Research and Practice. TechTrends, 64(6), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00549-6
• A mixed-method study of how instructors design for learning in online and distance education - use of analytics and surveys “for a better understanding of the complex design process in online distance higher education”
• Design as a discipline for Postdigital learning and Teaching: Bricolage and Actor-Network Theory - more general but interesting theoretical perspective

Related to [problems-with-modular-thinking]

• Modularity in the design of complex engineering systms
• The transformation of learning with technology: Learner-centricity, content and tool malleability and network effects
• Design, standards and reusability

Misc other

• Towards a CAS roadmap for information systems research
• Infrastructure as a complex adaptive system Five key theoretical propertise of CAS
  1. adaptive agents
  2. Diverse agents
  3. Dynamics
  4. Irreversibility
  5. Emergence
• Enterprise application integration and complex adaptive systems
• Business value of information technology: A complex adaptive systems theory view
• Revisiting the impact of information systems architecture complexity: a cas perpsective
• Reframing the dominant quests of information systms strategy research for complex adaptive business systems
• Driving organisational sustainability-oriented innovation capabilities: a copmelx adaptive systems perspective
• Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems
• Complex adaptive systems theory in information systems
• Capturing bottom-up information technology use process