Skip to content

To read#

See also: todays-note

Collection of articles, web pages etc that I need to read.

Teaching#

Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189--203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667065

Albarracín, L., Segura, C., Ferrando, I., & Gorgorió, N. (2022). Supporting mathematical modelling by upscaling real context in a sequence of tasks. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(3), 183--197. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab027

Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R., & Brown, M. (2018). Improving Mathematics in Key Stages Two and Three: Evidence Review. In Education Endowment Foundation: London, UK. [Report]. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/maths-ks-2-3

Maasz, J., & O'Donoghue, J. (Eds.). (2011). Real-World Problems for Secondary School Mathematics Students: Case Studies. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-543-7

Loewenberg Ball, D., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The Work of Teaching and the Challenge for Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497--511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479

BAD#

Gallagher, M., & Lamb, J. (2023). Open education in closed-loop systems: Enabling closures and open loops. Distance Education, 44(4), 620--636. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267475

How to help improve teaching and learning#

  • Martínez, C., & Olsson, T. (2021). Domestication outside of the domestic: Shaping technology and child in an educational moral economy. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 480--496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948011
  • Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Creating Epistemic Environments: Learning, Teaching and Design. In L. Markauskaite & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge (pp. 595–614). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4_20
  • Brooker, P. (2019). My unexpectedly militant bots: A case for Programming-as-Social-Science. The Sociological Review, 67(6), 1228--1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119840988`

Later

Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2006). Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems. In D. Braha, A. A. Minai, & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology (pp. 175--205). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_9

Bush, M. (2009). The Transformation of Learning with Technology: Learner-Centricity, Content and Tool Malleability, and Network Effects. Educational Technology, 49(2), 3--20.

Misc other#

Oughton, E. J., Usher, W., Tyler, P., & Hall, J. W. (2018). Infrastructure as a Complex Adaptive System. Complexity, 2018, e3427826. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3427826

Five key theoretical propertise of CAS 1. adaptive agents 2. Diverse agents 3. Dynamics 4. Irreversibility 5. Emergence

Nan, N. (2011). Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 505--532. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044054

David Schilling, R., Beese, J., Kazem Haki, M., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2017). Revisiting the Impact of Information Systems Architecture Complexity: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective. Thirty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/entities/publication/805b5818-0562-4b68-83c8-c8f2f3879dfb/details

Chen, C.-C., & Crilly, N. (2016). From modularity to emergence: A primer on the design and science of complex systems. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/260354