Skip to content

Mathematics Conceptual Knowledge for Teaching (MCKT)#

See also: teaching-mathematics

Li et al (2019) define MCKT as key to helping students learn with understanding and define it as

topic-based conceptual knowledge packages that are needed for understanding, explaining, as well as teaching specific mathematics content topics with connections.

Three topic-based components#

And it consisting of three topic-based knowledge components.

Component Description
1. K&S directly associated with a specific content topic common CK which students will learn
2. Ability to connect and justify the main points of a content topic, and to place it in wider contexts place the content topic in the broader knowledge structure
3. Knowing and being able to use various representations for teaching the content topic and being able to teach the relations between them Mainly to pedagogical aspects of the topic

The second component is problematic for some of the same reasons raised around exploring-australian-curriculum. It is also seen as the one with which PSTs are least familiar.

More often than not, (2) is presented as great challenges to prospective and practicing teachers as it often requires conceptual understanding across different content topics that are connected.

The distinction with PCK is in the packaging. PCK separates based on pedagogy and content. MCKT separates based on content topic. e.g. PCK is knowledge separated into pieces, not packages (topics).

Ball extends Schulman's PCK work by refining

  • PCK into
  • knowledge of content and students;
  • knowledge of content and teaching;
  • knowledge of curriculum.
  • CK into
  • common content knowledge
  • specialised content knowledge
  • horizon knowledge

Argument is that MCKT escapes the further refinement/complication of Ball's work and also unites the content and pedagogical knowledge into topics.

Similarly work around teachers' knowledge constructs in large scale assessments breaks the knowledge into

  • mathematics content knowledge
  • mathematics pedagogical content knowledge
  • general pedagogical knowledge

Knowledge quartet (Rowland et al, 2019) developed for observation and assessment. MCKT is intended to knowledge are needed when teaching specific content topics.

Dimension Description
Foundation Propositional knowledge and beliefs. mathematics and pedagogy.
Transformation Knowledge-in-action used in planning and teaching. Mostly PCK
Connection Knowledge-in-action unifying subject matter and coherence.
Contingency Knowledge-in-interaction - thinking on feet

Background#

Three types of knowledge often mentioned: mathematical CK and PCK and general pedagogical knowledge.

On the difficult of gathering and weaving (gather-weave) between disparate knowledge strands

However, if salient connections among different knowledge components are left unspecified in their knowledge preparation, prospective teachers would be left to make such connections by themselves after learning separate pieces of knowledge.

Make the argument that teachers need topic-based integrated knowledge that allows them to make content connections between different topics and representations. A key skills is the ability to gather and weave (pack) the knowledge into "key pieces".

References#

Rowland, T. (2019). Researching Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching. In International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 105--128). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004418875_005

Li, Y., Pang, J., Zhang, H., & Song, N. (2019). Mathematics Conceptual Knowledge for Teaching: Helping Prospective Teachers Know Mathematics Well Enough for Teaching. In International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 77--104). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004418875_004